Rio tinto employee denies being 'pushed' on mine submissions
SUNSHINE – A Rio tinto employee has denied being 'pushed' on a mine submission, and a video shows him telling a group he was assaulted by a member of an Rio group of labourers on the same day.
Rio employee and mine surveyor Mike Rigg said in a police interview in February 2015 that at a "barn yard" in the early hours of January 1, 2014, he was approached by two miners on the surface of the mine.
They claimed there had been an incident.
Rigg and others from the company's survey division who were gathered then had to be forced to take the men into an area near the mine's iron-ore processing plant, which they said had been swarming with workers.
The men insisted they had been pushed on, Rigg claimed, and that he had a camera and could document it, he told the police.
In the police interview, the company told Rigg, then 42, who lives on the Sunshine Coast and works for Rigg's company, that they had a video of the incident.
"I asked if they could give me the video that's relevant to what I wanted to talk to you about," Rigg told the police.
"They said, 'no, it's not relevant to what we're here to discuss', and then they started talking about how that was in the past, you know."
The incident had happened a year earlier.
According to the Rigg investigation, at some point later that year, the mine staff saw Rigg's video online.
The mining company has acknowledged it provided the footage but it has also acknowledged that they were aware there was "a video recording of a violent confrontation of Rio staff" at the surface mine.
"It's very much a work in progress for us and it's a story that we want to see out in the world and it's a story we are going to continue to pursue," said Rio president Eulalio Neptuna on Wednesday.
Rio mine workers said there was no force used that morning. "I had to put my hand up to block the entrance on the way in, not take my finger from the safety pad," said Rigg.
Rigg said there had been no verbal exchanges with management or the company.
He said the workers had been at a mine in Marabao when a team from the Rio group was sent back on site to report that work continued but that no safety issue had been identified.
The workers were called to the mine after they found Rigg's phone and his laptop on the ground near his work station.
The men accused the mining company o
<a href=
https://www.cashmudra.com/>바카라사이트</a>
<a href=
https://www.prakritikolkata.com/>예스카지노</a>
Independents back greens bank bill?
The Green party did not put forward the bills, because the House of Commons has already passed their budget. Liberal Democrat and Labour MPs have supported them. Some greens have claimed, however, that the bill would have helped Labour MPs gain votes from other parties and therefore benefit from the Lib Dems' vote.
It is possible that Labour MPs could benefit from the vote as a result of them voting in favour of the bill, or by voting against it, but this would come at the cost of the votes of others from the Liberal Democrat and Labour parties. In this situation, the bill would have been successful at gaining support from the Liberal Democrats and Labour and would therefore have helped them gain votes from other parties. The bill passed by a larger number of Liberal Democrat and Labour MPs at last year's election than it did in 2010.
It remains to be seen whether Greens and Liberal Democrats are committed to supporting the Greens and Greens in the Commons. There has been very little media activity in the wake of the bill's passage, although Greens leader Cllr Caroline Lucas told the Guardian that the party would support the bill. If that is the case and the bill is now passed as currently planned, there would need to be much more campaigning for the bill, including a push for party leadership and MPs to vote in favour of it. But this would not bring in enough support for it.
